<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Webdogs 3.0 &#187; arc90</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webdogs.org/tag/arc90/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webdogs.org</link>
	<description>site sentient since 2006</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 22:17:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Readability + The Printliminator!</title>
		<link>http://webdogs.org/2010/06/09/readability-the-printliminator/</link>
		<comments>http://webdogs.org/2010/06/09/readability-the-printliminator/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 22:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Lawlor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arc90]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[css-tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[printliminator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[readability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdogs.org/?p=1488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Early last year I mentioned the Arc90 Readability bookmarklet and why I liked it. Since then the developer has released the Readability add-on for Firefox, which I find inordinately useful and practical. (There is a Chrome variation called Readability Redux, based on the Arc90 code but created by a different developer.) The Readability extension does [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Early last year I mentioned the <a href="http://lab.arc90.com/experiments/readability/">Arc90 Readability</a> bookmarklet and <a href="http://www.webdogs.org/2009/03/12/readabilty-the-bookmarklet/">why I liked it</a>. Since then the developer has released the <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/46442/">Readability add-on for Firefox</a>, which I find inordinately useful and practical. (There is a Chrome variation called <a href="https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/jggheggpdocamneaacmfoipeehedigia?hl=en">Readability Redux</a>, based on the Arc90 code but created by a different developer.)</p>
<p>The Readability extension does a simple thing I need literally every day, i.e., it makes single posts superbly more readable and printable. It is that simple. For any article on the Web I have a serious interest in reading, rather than just scanning, then I want what Readability does for me: With one click, I have the article stripped of all that is extraneous, set typographically for ease of reading with an optimal font family, font size, content width and comfortable leading, and I can also print it out should that suit me.</p>
<p>To see how well this works, take a raw gander at this article today by Gail Collins and David Brooks of the New York Times: <a href="http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/06/09/where-did-all-the-angry-voters-go/">Where Did All the Angry Voters Go?</a> Sure, it&#8217;s readable enough. If you are OK with the altogether small font and old school newspaper-y column width, not to mention all the other clutter and advertisements on the page. Then install the Readability add-on and view the same page again. As my ophthalmologist always asks me, &#8220;<a href="http://www.webdogs.org/dog_files/raw-page.png" alt="">Better one</a> or <a href="http://www.webdogs.org/dog_files/readable-page.png" alt="">better two</a>?&#8221;</p>
<p>But wait, there are even <em>more</em> options! Try <a href="http://css-tricks.com/examples/ThePrintliminator/">The Printliminator</a> bookmarklet, available at the extraordinary <a href="http://css-tricks.com">CSS-Tricks</a>. I don&#8217;t think you can beat the overall ease of use one gets from the Readability add-on, but The Printliminator gives you a further edge: You can first view the article via Readability, and then trigger The Printliminator to remove all the images or photos in the article, to strip everything down even further. Again, &#8220;<a href="http://www.webdogs.org/dog_files/readable-page.png" alt=""">Better one</a> (using Readability) or <a href="http://www.webdogs.org/dog_files/printliminator-page.png" alt=""">better two</a> (using Readability + The Printliminator)?&#8221;</p>
<p>You decide.</p>
<h2  class="related_post_title">Other posts of possible interest...</h2><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://webdogs.org/2011/04/29/underlined-links-does-real-world-usability-trump-the-canonical-view/" title="Underlined links: Does real-world usability trump the canonical view?">Underlined links: Does real-world usability trump the canonical view?</a></li><li><a href="http://webdogs.org/2010/12/15/rebuild-08-project-content-and-css3-transition-examples/" title="Rebuild 08: Project content and CSS3 transition examples">Rebuild 08: Project content and CSS3 transition examples</a></li><li><a href="http://webdogs.org/2009/03/12/readabilty-the-bookmarklet/" title="Readability: The Bookmarklet">Readability: The Bookmarklet</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://webdogs.org/2010/06/09/readability-the-printliminator/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

