<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Webdogs 3.0 &#187; privacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webdogs.org/tag/privacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webdogs.org</link>
	<description>site sentient since 2006</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 00:10:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Confidentiality and technology: California&#8217;s proposed ethics opinion</title>
		<link>http://webdogs.org/2009/12/03/confidentiality-and-technology-californias-proposed-ethics-opinion/</link>
		<comments>http://webdogs.org/2009/12/03/confidentiality-and-technology-californias-proposed-ethics-opinion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 01:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Lawlor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confidentiality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdogs.org/?p=1105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Proposed Formal Opinion Interim No. 08-0002 (Confidentiality and Technology) has been flying under the radar for most California attorneys, but for the first time the technology chicken is coming home to roost in the California Bar&#8217;s first proposed ethics opinion at the juncture of client confidentiality and technology. You can download the seven-page proposed opinion. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.calbar.ca.gov/AboutUs/PublicComment/201001.aspx">Proposed Formal Opinion Interim No. 08-0002 (Confidentiality and Technology)</a> has been flying under the radar for most California attorneys, but for the first time the technology chicken is coming home to roost in the California Bar&#8217;s first proposed ethics opinion at the juncture of client confidentiality and technology. You can download the <a href="http://www.calbar.ca.gov/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=odIjrEe0wjI%3d&#038;tabid=2167">seven-page proposed opinion</a>. The proposed opinion remains open to public comment until January 4, 2010.</p>
<p>On balance, it is an excellent description of how newer technologies impact the duties of competence and client confidentiality. It seems particularly wise in not addressing these issues by taking on particular technologies; rather it provides a sensible approach enabling an attorney to understand what the potential problems are and how they miight be resolved in a practical while ethical manner.</p>
<p>I differ with the opinion on language in the section about &#8220;legal ramifications to a third party who intercepts, accesses or exceeds authorized use of the electronic information.&#8221; The discussion at page five of the opinion does clear things up in that regard, but the summary point could be clearer. What I think they mean to say is &#8220;applicability of civil or criminal laws protecting an expectation of privacy, with consequences to a third party who intercepts, accesses or exceeds authorized use of the electronic information.&#8221;</p>
<h2  class="related_post_title">Other posts of possible interest...</h2><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://webdogs.org/2010/12/17/california-publishes-formal-ethics-opinion-on-technology-and-client-confidentiality/" title="California publishes formal ethics opinion on technology and client confidentiality">California publishes formal ethics opinion on technology and client confidentiality</a></li><li><a href="http://webdogs.org/2011/05/22/the-aba-at-the-intersection-of-cloud-computing-and-legal-ethics/" title="The ABA at the intersection of cloud computing and legal ethics">The ABA at the intersection of cloud computing and legal ethics</a></li><li><a href="http://webdogs.org/2011/04/25/the-ethical-obligation-to-pay-attention/" title="The ethical obligation to pay attention">The ethical obligation to pay attention</a></li><li><a href="http://webdogs.org/2008/08/24/pondering-your-own-privacy-panic-attack/" title="Pondering your own privacy panic attack">Pondering your own privacy panic attack</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://webdogs.org/2009/12/03/confidentiality-and-technology-californias-proposed-ethics-opinion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pondering your own privacy panic attack</title>
		<link>http://webdogs.org/2008/08/24/pondering-your-own-privacy-panic-attack/</link>
		<comments>http://webdogs.org/2008/08/24/pondering-your-own-privacy-panic-attack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 06:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Lawlor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdogs.org/?p=285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Problems with privacy are among the most recurring topics of interest to geek heads in the legal services community. To feed that understandable preoccupation, consider Scientific American Magazine&#8217;s special September focus on The Future of Privacy. (You can get a quick overview of the issue in Barb Iverson&#8217;s post at Poynter Online, Sept. Scientific American: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Problems with privacy are among the most recurring topics of interest to geek heads in the legal services community. To feed that understandable preoccupation, consider Scientific American Magazine&#8217;s special September focus on <a href="http://www.sciam.com/sciammag/?contents=2008-09">The Future of Privacy</a>. (You can get a quick overview of the issue in Barb Iverson&#8217;s post at Poynter Online, <a href="http://www.poynter.org/column.asp?id=31&#038;aid=149168">Sept. Scientific American: Dude, Where&#8217;s My Privacy</a>.)</p>
<h2  class="related_post_title">Other posts of possible interest...</h2><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://webdogs.org/2009/12/03/confidentiality-and-technology-californias-proposed-ethics-opinion/" title="Confidentiality and technology: California&#8217;s proposed ethics opinion">Confidentiality and technology: California&#8217;s proposed ethics opinion</a></li><li><a href="http://webdogs.org/2008/02/18/pbs-mediashift-takes-on-privacy-and-ninjas/" title="PBS MediaShift takes on privacy &#8230; and ninjas!">PBS MediaShift takes on privacy &#8230; and ninjas!</a></li><li><a href="http://webdogs.org/2007/12/19/google-privacy-videos-now-available/" title="Google &#8220;privacy&#8221; videos now available">Google &#8220;privacy&#8221; videos now available</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://webdogs.org/2008/08/24/pondering-your-own-privacy-panic-attack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PBS MediaShift takes on privacy &#8230; and ninjas!</title>
		<link>http://webdogs.org/2008/02/18/pbs-mediashift-takes-on-privacy-and-ninjas/</link>
		<comments>http://webdogs.org/2008/02/18/pbs-mediashift-takes-on-privacy-and-ninjas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 23:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Lawlor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdogs.org/2008/02/18/pbs-mediashift-takes-on-privacy-and-ninjas/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Privacy. It&#8217;s a recurring topic of obvious concern to folks. Of note, a useful overview article a few days back from Mark Glaser of PBS MediaShift fame: Your Guide to Online Privacy. The article includes familiar riffs on the privacy impact of search engines and social network sites, as well as a useful list of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Privacy. It&#8217;s a recurring topic of obvious concern to folks. Of note, a useful overview article a few days back from Mark Glaser of PBS <a href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/">MediaShift</a> fame: <a href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2008/02/digging_deeperyour_guide_to_on_1.html">Your Guide to Online Privacy</a>. The article includes familiar riffs on the privacy impact of search engines and social network sites, as well as a useful list of &#8220;privacy sites&#8221; and &#8220;privacy manifestos,&#8221; if you&#8217;re into that.</p>
<p>Less useful in a practical sense but emblematic of the editorial tone of a lot of the MediaShift content is an even more recent, only so-so post about <a href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2008/02/best_use_of_the_medium5_videob.html">5 Videoblogs That Do It Right</a>. Personally, I don&#8217;t have it in me to prioritize web video feeds as part of my cognitive daily diet, but I have to give props to MediaShift for picking up on video cult comedy fave <a href="http://askaninja.com/">Ask A Ninja</a>, who are responsible for, among other things, an especially authoritative <a href="http://askaninja.com/node/1175">review of Pirates of the Caribbean</a>.</p>
<h2  class="related_post_title">Other posts of possible interest...</h2><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://webdogs.org/2010/12/20/in-case-youve-run-out-of-gift-ideas/" title="In case you&#8217;ve run out of gift ideas">In case you&#8217;ve run out of gift ideas</a></li><li><a href="http://webdogs.org/2009/12/03/confidentiality-and-technology-californias-proposed-ethics-opinion/" title="Confidentiality and technology: California&#8217;s proposed ethics opinion">Confidentiality and technology: California&#8217;s proposed ethics opinion</a></li><li><a href="http://webdogs.org/2009/11/08/its-a-beautiful-day-in-the-neighborhood/" title="It&#8217;s a beautiful day in the neighborhood">It&#8217;s a beautiful day in the neighborhood</a></li><li><a href="http://webdogs.org/2009/06/07/dealin-with-the-down-and-out-at-the-ipanic-app-store/" title="Dealin&#8217; with the down and out, at the iPanic app store">Dealin&#8217; with the down and out, at the iPanic app store</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://webdogs.org/2008/02/18/pbs-mediashift-takes-on-privacy-and-ninjas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google &#8220;privacy&#8221; videos now available</title>
		<link>http://webdogs.org/2007/12/19/google-privacy-videos-now-available/</link>
		<comments>http://webdogs.org/2007/12/19/google-privacy-videos-now-available/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 22:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Lawlor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdogs.org/2007/12/19/google-privacy-videos-now-available/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today Google announced a new privacy tips video series available for viewing via YouTube. As of today it comprises an eleven-set playlist of Google Privacy Tips videos. Helpful for those who strive to better understand how Google privacy settings work for a range of its much-used products. Other posts of possible interest...Our final 15 minutes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today Google announced a <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2007/12/new-privacy-tips-video-series.html">new privacy tips video series</a> available for viewing via YouTube. As of today it comprises an eleven-set playlist of <a href="http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=FCEE46AA997A23D9">Google Privacy Tips videos</a>. Helpful for those who strive to better understand how Google privacy settings work for a range of its much-used products.</p>
<h2  class="related_post_title">Other posts of possible interest...</h2><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://webdogs.org/2010/07/08/our-final-15-minutes-of-google-fame/" title="Our final 15 minutes of Google fame">Our final 15 minutes of Google fame</a></li><li><a href="http://webdogs.org/2010/06/25/shout-out-for-lsnc-psa/" title="Shout out for LSNC PSA">Shout out for LSNC PSA</a></li><li><a href="http://webdogs.org/2010/04/01/fast-breaking-google-news/" title="Fast breaking Google news">Fast breaking Google news</a></li><li><a href="http://webdogs.org/2010/02/02/legal-research-and-the-need-to-be-more-like-google/" title="Legal research and the need to be &#8220;more like Google&#8221;">Legal research and the need to be &#8220;more like Google&#8221;</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://webdogs.org/2007/12/19/google-privacy-videos-now-available/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

