Underlined links: Does real-world usability trump the canonical view?
Google apparently is evaluating whether the removal of title underlining in search results brings improvements in usability. Tell me about it.
There has long been a broader debate about whether link underlining is a distraction. My personal opinion is that the gains in readability far outweigh the canonical view advanced by Jakob Nielsen, i.e., the perceived affordance that comes with visually displaying underlined links. I would contend that the familiarity and ease with varied visual displays of affordance of links are now so deep and wide among users, as not to be as compelling or as essential as Nielsen suggests.
This is why all LSNC sites by default have for the last 10 years or so not displayed underlined links. In that time, not a single person has complained they could not figure out where the links were. And it is why, as we continue our rebuild of all the LSNC sites, we are styling the Google custom search results so that titles are not underlined.


