Posts tagged: work paradigms

  • Monday
  • October 10
  • 2011

Google and the Circle of Life

A few weeks back, at a LSNC organization-wide staff meeting, I gave the type of tech presentation I am always asked to give at such events: A state-of-organizational-tech overview/update, reviewing what has changed at LSNC in the last year and what changes are coming in the next, with a few tech funsies to keep the crowd awake. We did have some real fun with the session. Among other things, the LSNC tech team attempted some Harry Potter shtick involving an audience volunteer, a wizard’s hat, an incantation of “Google nexus transportus confundum!” while automatically uploading a photo to the web clipboard in Google Docs, via a Google Nexus phone. While amused by the shtick (you had to be there), the smartphone-savvy audience was also largely unimpressed, as if to say, “Tell me something I don’t already know.”

Whew, is it ever getting harder to impress our staff with technology. The transformative Big-Bang days are long over. The technology bar has raised considerably the last few years within our organization, and while changes are appreciated they often evoke an expression akin to “Is that all you’ve got?”

To be fair, we were able to show our staffers a few things that were new for them, most notably a preview of the Google Apps + Pika integrations everyone at LSNC have been hearing about but most had not seen before. Folks were attentive as we showed them the Google Calendar and Google Docs integrations, their silent nods saying, “Good, good.” When we showed them how the Gmail integration works, the reaction was anything but silent. All we did was show a Gmail message and drew attention to a new button at the bottom of the message. When the presenter Mark Sawyer said, “… and when you click on this button the message is automatically copied over to your Pika case notes,” the room exploded with applause.

Was the applause a measure of their being impressed by the technology? Not really, in my view. I think it was a measure of how users of very familiar technologies — in this case the Pika case management system and Gmail — now think or expect the technologies to work… together. It was not an “Oh My God” moment. It was a “Thank God” moment. The applause was a shared expression of technological redemption from the tedium of having, for so long, to copy-n-paste email messages from Gmail over to Pika. The audience was not so much amazed as relieved.

Such sentiment is a shift in what are practical, reasonable expectations among our users about now common technologies working the way they need them to work. In our organization’s case, the adoption of the Google Apps platform is not about what is cool or even “the Google” itself. What it is really about is the shift in a larger, overarching work paradigm. The desktop, the cloud and mobile devices are not separate work paradigms. They are simply tools that we can reasonably anticipate our users need or will need soon enough to do their work, to be productive. To be Google-specific about it, that is the thinking behind our efforts at exploiting the Google API to integrate or share, as seamlessly as possible, select content within Pika with Google Calendar and Google Docs, or within Gmail and Google Groups with Pika.

Although there are pockets of differences within our organization, it is fair to say that most here have settled into the new work paradigm: the networked desktop is just another device connected to the web, which is the cloud, which is accessible most everywhere via any number of mobile devices. Hakuna matata, my friends. It’s the circle of life.

  • Tuesday
  • July 12
  • 2011

Whither WordPerfect? (Pulling the plug on grandma)

Admittedly, the post title is more rhetorical and sensationalistic than anything I am about to say. On the other hand, it is the actual title of two slides I am using this Thursday at part of a presentation to the LSNC technology working group. So, you ask, “What are you really saying?”

It’s like this: A year and a half ago on the LStech list, in one of those increasingly rare but always-a-hoot discussions about the Word verses WordPerfect debate, I had this to say:

What is likely to shift the balance of use between Word and WordPerfect in our own organization over time is, of course, an aging work force that still relies on it (I am one of those people) and, ironically, not Microsoft but Google, which facilitates use of the DOC and other MS file formats with its various Google Apps. As an organization we are moving heavily in that direction.

LSNC has never seen this debate as particularly binary, an approach that I suspect is contrary to the path pursued by most legal services field programs. Whether Word or WordPerfect was better or worse than the other has been beside the point. We’ve always had other, more consequential technological, work-productive, and advocacy-oriented fish to fry. Our focus on options for “word processing” has always been on making the advocates productive. In practice this has translated into not caring which text editor individual advocates prefer to use, whether it be Word, WordPerfect, Google Docs, or something else. And that continues to be the case.

But what does matter now is something that was not decisive in the past: The work paradigm has changed in a fundamental and permanent way. That shift in the work paradigm now translates into the need of our advocates to work remotely, have universal access, and be productive with an increasing wide range of mobile devices. And for things to work with the likes of Google Cloud Connect and whatever else is coming down the web-based work pipeline. I cannot tell you what those things will be but I can guarantee this: None of us will ever see a WordPerfect mobile app.

We love you grandma. Rest in peace.

[Update: I was wrong, apparently there is a WordPerfect Viewer app for the iPhone and iPad, although the user reviews are overall negative.]

  • Tuesday
  • March 29
  • 2011

The impact of proliferating “share” options on our use of project management tools

Last week, after several years of gratifying experience with Basecamp, our organization dialed down our account to the free plan, just to keep the account minimally active. Other than that, we have stopped using Basecamp.

How did that happen? Was it something Basecamp did? No, not at all.

Basecamp is a fantastic product. It was only three years ago that I gave a TIG presentation about Basecamp in which I sang the praises of Basecamp and how it was an indispensable tool in planning, editing and building out the California Food Stamp Guide web project, one which involved collaboration among eleven editors sprawled across four different legal services organizations. At that juncture, Basecamp was the web-based benchmark for project management: A secure, well designed, user friendly set of core project management tools (tasks, milestones, messaging and file storage) in a web-based workspace enabling multiple users from multiple locations to get things done on a shared project. It was an especially remarkable application 3-5 years ago because it effectively — and uniquely — integrated in one web location what we increasingly saw the need to do: Share stuff via the Web. Or as the metaphor for web productivity is now called, “the Cloud.”

What has changed in the last several years is that the notion of “sharing” things via the Web, once a novel or niche concept, is now the new norm. And the options for sharing work activity and work product have exploded exponentially in the last few years. During a recent telephone conversation with an executive director of another non-profit advocacy organization here in California who had called to talk about our organization’s experience with Google Apps, I started talking a fair amount about how the work paradigm has shifted so dramatically the last few years because of the proliferation of web-based applications like Gmail and Google Docs and Google Calendar. Part of that paradigm shift is the increasingly widespread expectation that someone you work with can “share” things with you, which is to say you are able to let the other person, via a web browser or mobile app, view, edit or comment on a shared document, presentation, image, whatever. I commented during the conversation something to the effect that there was a point in time when I thought it was odd that someone told me I could not send them a fax because their office had no fax machine; and at a later point in time when someone explained they had to fax something to me because they did not have email at their office; and then I observed that “I think we have reached a new tipping point, where others will reasonably expect you can offer or accept sharing of documents and files using applications like Google Docs.”

There’s the rub for an application like Basecamp. Five years ago what Basecamp offered was unique. It no longer is. The practical reality is that most everything we used to do with Basecamp we can now do with, or better, or in a more facile fashion with our hosted Google Apps. Shareable files with Google Docs. Check. Shareable real-time “writeboards” and editing with Google Docs. Check. Native document editing and sharing of MS Office files via Google Docs with Google Cloud Connect. Check. Integrated messaging with Gmail, Google Chat, and Google Docs. Check. Real-time document commenting with Google Docs Discussions. Check. Shareable private or public project content sites with Google Sites. Check. And for larger private or public work projects that require more complicated task and milestone management, well, there is Manymoon with Google Docs and Google Calendar integration. Check, and then some.

That is what the share explosion has done to our use of Basecamp, which remains an exceptional product but is no longer integral to what we do.